"Design Do’s for the Imaging Department", (c)
Morris A. Stein, Health Imaging & IT,
8/1/07Technology, staff and
patients have seeming divergent needs in a modern
medical imaging facility. Whether in a hospital or
an outpatient facility, advances in digital
imaging have made the challenge the movement of
people as well as the images. Blending “high tech”
with “high touch” and being able to expand and
change in the future becomes the opportunity.
Understanding what has changed—and what has not—in
both architecture and technology is essential to
medical imaging departments that are safe,
productive and comfortable.
The design of the modern medical imaging
department must meet several seemingly divergent
needs:
 | Accommodate large, heavy, noisy technical
medical equipment with extensive infrastructure
and shielding requirements. |
 | Create a safe, pleasant and efficient staff
work environment. |
 | Comfort patients who are likely to be
anxious or uncomfortable, or a combination of
both. |
New developments in medicine and architecture
influence the design of medical imaging
facilities. An understanding of what has changed –
and what has not – is essential to developing
safe, productive and comfortable imaging
departments and outpatient centers.
Technology
Change in imaging technology accelerates, fueled
by the development of digital information
technologies. Imaging technology is developing in
four ways: new technology, advances in specific
modalities, convergence and functional imaging.
The variety of imaging modalities and equipment
available make flexibility a key design factor.
The suite’s space and infrastructure must support
the latest technology, allowing for multiple
upgrades.
Future upgrades may involve more than simply
replacing old equipment. For example, some
hospitals now have two or more CT scanners, not
all located in the imaging department.
Imaging technologies have increased in number,
speed and power. A patient’s full body can be
scanned in less time that it takes to move the
patient in and out, creating design implications
for patient staging areas, dressing and staff work
areas.
Radiologists use the digital information base to
improve patient outcomes. The image of radiologist
in a dark room is transformed to an integral
information provider. As developments in digital
technology continue, imaging becomes accessible
and cost-effective. Scans are drastically
increasing in volume and number, with shorter scan
sessions and larger patient information sets.
Evidence-based medicine and, evidence-based design
has spurred important research into the measurable
impact of design on patient outcomes, staff
performance and overall efficiency. Based on
research, design includes increased natural light,
appropriate materials and measurable design
impacts on work performance are being incorporated
into new hospitals and outpatient imaging centers.
Natural light in imaging rooms of all types – MRI,
CT, even R/F – will have the most significant
impact on patient comfort and anxiety.
Patient changing and staging areas should be
designed for privacy and dignity, avoiding the
bullpen-style large waiting spaces that are
unfriendly and unwelcoming. At the same time,
individual dressing rooms that really allow the
patient to change clothes and prepare, before and
after the imaging exam, will go a long way. Think
about department store dressing rooms, and what
works and what does not. Family spaces can be
designed for personal details and comfort,
reasonably close to the exam spaces and
facilitating a connection to daily activities.
Staff work areas are designed to facilitate tasks
and ergonomics to avoid repetitive drudgery, staff
comfort and ease of access to patients, work
products, radiologists and often the family, are
all appropriate examples utilized in projects
today.
Re-arranging the puzzle
The great benefit of digital imaging is that it
allows the movement of information and images –
not people. The design of any imaging department
is based on workflow and patient satisfaction, not
the physical movement of film. This fundamental
change allows the imaging department to be patient
focused, improve staff work habits and provide a
supportive family model.
A full understanding of technology design and
implementation is crucial, but it is only one
piece of the imaging puzzle. As technology becomes
more transparent, the organization of all
functions becomes a major determinant. With the
development of digital image systems, radiologists
are often centralized for collaborative,
specialized imaging interpretation.
The other piece is patients: the number of
procedures and time required for each visit and
requirements and average number of procedures is
changing. More recent designs provide individual
dressing rooms adjacent to the procedure room,
where patients can change and wait with greater
privacy and dignity. Modern imaging departments
require patient prep and recovery spaces for
interventional procedures.
Rules for planning and design
Although much of today’s imaging equipment and
healthcare construction is new, many of the rules
for planning and design remain the same. The
environment stresses the transparency of medical
imaging technology and installation.
Unfortunately, that thinking allows a lack of
attention to details, fundamental requirements and
even safety concerns. A good rule of thumb for
basic imaging planning: Architecture (and
architects) may be forgiving, but technology never
is. For instance, while MRI installation has been
accomplished in smaller rooms, the basic
understanding of magnetic field placement or
restrictions has not changed. Current-generation
CT or R/F equipment still requires adequate
radiation shielding and clean power, if not more
so.
Current Determinants
Imaging technology is focused toward MRI, CT and
PET, more often being combined with CT in PET/CT.
It is timely to consider current design
determinants:
 | Space: For the dimensions
and weight of the equipment, and to support
appropriate clinical patient care and staff
support. |
 | Vendor shop drawings: These
critical planning tools provide baseline
information for guiding templates and
establishing critical utilities or services, but
do not provide the level of design detail as
architectural drawings. |
 | Establishing room size:
Minimal room size does not adequately support
patient care needs, appropriate line of sight to
observe the patient or critical staff support. |
 | Upgrades: Complex spaces
will be the standard. Digital imaging technology
will not necessarily reduce room size. |
 | Magnet requirements: As MRI
equipment has increased in power, magnetic
fields have increased, too. Changes mean the
increases are not directly proportional. |
 | CT speed: Influences the
room and shielding design. The greater
throughput of high-speed scanners can result in
a more patients undergoing scans daily and
planning must be done accordingly. |
 | Hospital requirements:
Inpatients require more care than ambulatory
care patients. This may limit the number of
patients hospital radiology departments can
assess daily. |
 | PET and PET/CT: High
radiation doses have a major impact on planning
and shielding. Due to large exposure used for
imaging, areas that do not require shielding
with other imaging modalities require
protection. |
 | Soundproofing: An essential
and often overlooked component of MRI suites is
soundproofing. |
 | Vibration: This is a
crucial issue for MRI and CT. This can be
controlled by isolated slab design and special
anchorage details. |
 | Digital reading room:
Incorporating image interpretation, PACS and
radiology information systems are carefully
designed for physical space demands, lighting
and ergonomics. Lighting must be placed to avoid
glare on the monitor. Individual work spaces
must be designed to allow privacy and
collaboration at the same time. Work surfaces
and seating must consider flexibility for height
and physical comfort which supports work
performance. |
Safety standards and guidelines
Patient safety in radiology is a growing concern.
Safety standards and guidelines are significant
for architects and owners. Carelessness in
planning and design is often the result of taking
basic criteria for granted. Adopted safety
guidelines should be referenced in planning
standards or regulations.
For ionizing radiation, shielding characteristics
are based on the National Council on Radiation
Protection and Measurements (NCRP) Report 147:
Structural Shielding Design for Medical X-Ray
Imaging Facilities. The information has been
updated, including new modalities not previously
discussed.
Expect more safety standards and planning
questions for radiology.
Healing environments for imaging
While imaging equipment and technology planning
concerns are important, these considerations
should not override those of employees and
patients. Patients and staff are in a stressful
situation, no matter the quality of technology.
The requirements of the technology should be dealt
with transparently, so that individuals can focus
on the environment.
Patients are concerned about privacy and the
unknown. Imaging can be a sterile, restricted
environment. Thus it makes good sense to utilize
design to stress communication flow, involvement
and empowerment whenever and wherever possible.
Let’s face it; imaging for the patients involves
waiting and abandonment, two difficult factors to
overcome without some help in the design.
Staff are concerned about technical performance
and patient accommodation, while performing highly
repetitive tasks. The design of staff spaces that
focus on work flow and improved job performance
will result in patient and staff satisfaction,
less errors, and likely improved work.
In both cases, the result will be a tangible step
to deal with increased work demand and ever faster
technology. Shorter imaging exams due to less
patient anxiety and improved staff performance can
be expected. Another side benefit of happier
patients and staff is the long-term relationship,
another step to confront the anonymity of the
medical care process.
An evidence-based consensus emerges that the
design of care environments helps patients feel
safe, comfortable and facilitates the healing
process, the trend toward healthy design and its
compelling benefits is too powerful to ignore for
imaging spaces. Evidence suggests design can
improve patient, family, and staff satisfaction,
provide a positive return on investment and even
directly impact image quality.
Trends
A survey in the October 2006 issue of Health
Imaging and IT magazine revealed that the top
three trends in imaging are:
 | Improving workflow |
 | Increasing procedure volumes |
 | Adding/improving information systems and IT
|
Improvement of the environment was not
explicitly mentioned in any of the top 20
responses, yet all of these goals can be
accomplished through a design process.
No matter what the technology, it has a
fundamental relationship with planning and design.
While technology density and patient volume might
be of the greatest concern, the environment may
have the biggest impact on improving the imaging
experience.
Teamwork
Due to the complexities of designing for modern
medical imaging, design teamwork is ever more
important. Everyone involved in the
design—architects, radiologists, equipment
vendors, patients and their families—all
contribute to the design that successfully meet
the needs of advanced imaging technology while
supporting the people who use it.
|
|